Sign up to add this to your collection
|
Sign up to add this to your favorites
|
|
67%
Overall Rating
|
|
Ranked #11,728
...out of 16,695 movies
|
Sign up to check in!
|
In The XXXorcist, after all other exorcism methods fail, Father Merkin has no other option but to screw the hell (and the devil) out of a possessed woman, Regan Teresa MacFeel. Her Mother, Mrs. MacFeel looks on helplessly until she succumbs to the evil and becomes possessed as well. Father Merkin is forced to fight for his life... with his genitals.
--TMDb
|
Review by Chad
Added: May 30, 2007
I'm a sucker for good horror / comedy / parody / porn offerings, especially if they actually have something going on for them other than "hey, let's come up with something to string these sex scenes along." Honestly, what's not to love about a film that incorporates the best of every genre - good laughs, gross-out scenes, the occasional gore sequence, and plenty of female nudity - into one offering? Nearly every halfway decent horror movie in existence has been spoofed in the world of XXX films at least once over the years, but to the best of my knowledge, nobody ever tackled what some consider to be the granddaddy of modern horror: The Exorcist. That all changed, however, with Burning Angel's release of The XXXorcist, and I couldn't have been more pleased with the results.
The film wastes no time in getting down to business, as the opening scene finds Father Merkin (Tommy Pistol) visiting the MacFeel residence in order to perform an exorcism on young Regan (Joanna Angel). Regan's mother (Kylee Kross) warns Merkin that this is no ordinary case, but Merkin is determined to cast the demons out of this young woman once and for all. When conventional methods fail to achieve the expected results, Merkin must attempt to perform the ultimate in religious rituals: the sexorcism.
Since this is a pornographic film, I'm pretty sure that you'll be able to guess how this "ritual" is performed. For the slower readers out there, here's a hint: there's three stages of it and a woman has three orifices, so you do the math. To spice things up just a bit, the mother gets involved with both her daughter and the preacher as things move along, and once all of the actor / actress combinations are exhausted (including the inevitable threesome), they turn to a handful of "religious artifacts" to complete the ritual: the Virgin Mary dildo, the Jesus Christ (on a cross!) dildo, and the Baby Jesus butt plug.
Of course, there's a lot of sex scenes to be found throughout the running time; that much goes without saying, and it's actually pretty steamy if you get off on green slime-spewing pussies. However, I was pleasantly surprised by how many nods to the source material the filmmakers managed to slip in as the film progressed. Most films of this nature would be content to pull something along the lines of "he's a preacher, she's possessed, now let's get down to the fucking and sucking" and put it on shelves as a parody; sure, the label would technically be correct, but that's not the sort of thing that makes a classic film. Most of the classic scenes from The Exorcist are present here in one way or another: the head-spinning scene, the bed-floating moment, the infamous crucifix scene, the line about his mother sucking cock in hell (said in a slightly updated way, but it's there), and of course, lots of green slime... lots of green slime that emanates from every orifice.
Overall, this is an easy film to judge due to the fact that it makes no "bones" about what it is. If the thought of watching a preacher fuck the devil out of a young woman while she shoots green slime out of her vagina turns you on and if you think it'd be pretty hot to watch a mother use a crucifix on her daughter in a manner most unholy, don't waste any time in picking this one up: you'll get all that and plenty of laughs to go along with it. 8/10.
|
|
#1:
grain of sand
- added 06/01/2007, 10:48 PM
the burning angel girls churn out some great
stuff:]
I think they did a re-animator
parody also, but I could be wrong.
|
|
#2:
Chad
- added 06/01/2007, 11:32 PM
Indeed they did (Repenetrator), but I wouldn't
feel right about reviewing that since I've only
seen the censored version. A pity, really.
|
|
#3:
Tristan
- added 06/01/2007, 11:55 PM
How do they have a censored porn?
|
|
#4:
Chad
- added 06/02/2007, 12:12 AM
They cut out all of the hardcore stuff and left in
the softcore scenes.
|
|
#5:
Tristan
- added 06/02/2007, 12:22 AM
So from what I can gather, it's just like this
movie.
|
|
#6:
Chad
- added 06/02/2007, 12:47 AM
Nailed that one.
|
|
#7:
Ashley
- added 06/06/2007, 02:21 AM
Where the hell did you find this?
|
|
#8:
Chad
- added 06/06/2007, 03:00 AM
Bought it from their site. With a plot like that,
I couldn't resist.
|
|
#9:
asad
- added 12/28/2008, 06:56 AM
i dnt think mixing religion and esp the artifacts
things and to portray them as "sexual
objects" is more than wht you call immoral l
blasphemous content should be banned from
porn.
You really have to be twisted
really really bad up in your brain to even think
of such an portrayal....
shame shame
shame!.
|
|
#10:
Chad
- added 12/28/2008, 09:29 AM
If you're going to be all holier than thou about
it... why were you, a person who obviously cares
about your spiritual beliefs, looking up a
hardcore sex movie in the first place? I'm far
from a religious man, but isn't pornography in
general sort of a no-no with whatever religion you
follow?
|
|